|
Austro-Daimler: The Bicycle That The Owner Of A Bösendorfer Imperial Piano Would Ride
Above: Author's Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II 57cm frame bicycle S/N 6164001 photographed 28 Sept. 2007 (194,945 bytes). Accessories that date the bike include: Silca Impero frame mounted pump, Rhode Gear Flickstand frame-mounted brace to park the bike upright, a Lock Sock (attached to the Top Tube forward of the Saddle) storing an original Citadel bike lock within. Click on image to see enlarged view (429,532 bytes).
Right: Joseph Werndl, founder of what would become best known as Steyr (11,191 bytes).
Left: Gottlieb Daimler, founder of Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft. Image c. 1900 (11,209 bytes).
On 11 August 1899 DMG founded a subsidiary company to represent DMG in Austria, this was the Österreichische Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft Bierenz, Fischer & Co. (Austrian Daimler Motors Partnership Company Bierenz, Fischer and Co). Established with DMG's subscribed investment of 200,000 guilders, the company offices were at Wiener Neustadt and in Wein (Vienna). By establishing this subsidiary DMG became the first automotive multinational company. Eduard Bierenz, a friend of Gottlieb Daimler, was appointed to manage the company. Bierenz worked with co-founder Edward Fischer, owner of an iron foundry and engineering company in Austria. Österreichische Daimler marketed under the shortened Austro-Daimler trade name. The first designer employed by the firm was Paul Daimler, the son of Gottlieb Daimler. In 1900 the company completed their first car, a four-seater with a two-cylinder gasoline engine, manufactured at Wiener Neustadt. In 1909 the Austro-Daimler company was formally made an independent concern though with stock held by Daimler, then in 1912 the Daimler company sold its shares in Austro-Daimler. From from 1899 through 1934 Austro-Daimler would produce motor vehicles including cars, trucks, buses, rail cars, and engines for marine applications. Eduard Fischer would remain active in the company through 1 June 1920.
Elsewhere, mechanic and inventor Johann Puch (b. 27 June 1862 in Juršinci, then Georgendorf, Germany now in Slovenia) learned much about mechanical design and production while working for a locksmith in southern Austria. After his military service he moved to Graz in 1885 where by 1888 he was hired as a bicycle mechanic working for the large-scale bicycle manufacturer Albl & Co. owned by Benedict Albl, at Lendplatz 14 in Graz. There he came upon the idea to set out and establish his own bicycle shop. On 2 February 1889 Puch requested to set up a bicycle repair shop on the premises of what had been a nursery, but that permission was declined owing to a conflict with fire regulations. By September 1889 the council agreed to issue a permit so that Puch could establish his small shop at Strauchergasse 18 in Graz, Austria for the repairing and manufacturing bicycles. By 1891 his company was offically registered as the "Johann Puch Erste Steiermärkische Fahrrad-Fabriks-Aktiengesellschaft" (First Styrian Bicycle Factory Corporation) with manufacturing based at Graz. He was soon selling his new bicycles bearing the trade name "Styria-Räder" (Stria-wheels), to customers within the Austrian Empire while also exporting to other European countries.
Puch must have been a good engineer or mechanic, or he knew to hire good employees; for either or both reasons his bicycles were becoming noteworthy among competitive cyclists in only a matter of a few years. By 1892 competitive and performing cyclists were endorsing the Puch bicycles in their own advertisements. Evidence of the superiority of the Puch bicycles includes: advertisements listing the accomplishments of riders who rode his bicycles in races, photos of bicycle club riders standing alongside Puch bicycles or with Puch promotional materials in the background, and these no doubt aided to the credibility of the new product at a time when bicycle popularity was just taking off. By 1894, after only a few years in business, Puch had also established sales offices in several cities across central Europe and with a business office in Wein (Vienna).
The white and green colors of Puch derive from those of Styria, the Austrian state (or Bundesland) where the company was founded. The shade of green used on the Styrian flag is that of a fir-tree green reflecting the pride of the residents in their forests of fir trees. Head badges on Puch bicycles bear white and green colors, as would competitive teams sponsored by Puch.
Left: bicycle painted head badge "STYRIA" FAHRRAD WERKE - STYRIA - Joh.Puch&Comp. - GRAZ" (13,765 bytes). By 1897 the Joh. Puch & Cie. Styria-Fahrradwerken (Johann Puch & Comp. Styria Bicycle Works) employed some 633 male and 83 female workers, with another 36 apprentices. But Johann Puch became embroiled in a legal dispute with the German Berlin Masschinenfabrik Dürkopp (Berlin machine factory). The result was he retained some interest in the company, but was essentially silenced and barred from contributing. So he and his former shop foreman Anton Werner (Werner & Co.) left to work on building a new company. Johann Puch was unable to market under his own name for legal reasons, so from 1897 to 1899 he marketed his bicycles under the trade name "Original Styria-Räder" (original Styria wheels). Thus two companies were competing then marketing essentially similar products: one as Styria, and the other as Puch managed by Puchs' former factory associate Victor Rumpf. The Styria-Fahrradwerke suffered from a five month long labor strike that spanned from 1907 into 1908, this caused enough losses so that the company failed. While the Puch company was originally established to produce bicycles, by 1901 the company tooled up to begin the manufacture of small gasoline engines. In 1903 the company expanded into the production of motorcycles, and by 1904 it was also manufacturing small automobiles. Many brilliant engineers were to become affiliated with the Austro-Daimler and Puch names, not the least of these was Ferdinand Porsche. Porsche was recruited by Austro-Daimler in 1906 to work as their chief automobile designer and Technical Director, taking over those duties from Paul Daimler. Porsche's best known designed Austro-Daimler car was introduced in 1910 as the Prinz Heinrich, a sporty model with a four speed transmission and powered by a water cooled 96 hp SOHC (Single Overhead Camshaft) in-line four cylinder engine; it was named after Wilhelm II's younger brother Prince Heinrich of Prussia. Johann Puch retired in 1912 after then contributing in an Emeritus status. He would see the Puch company expand to some 1,100 employees by the time he died at age 52 on 19 July 1914 in Zagreb (German Agram). The company was changed to "Puchwerke Aktiengesellschaft" (AG), a publicly traded stock company. The Puch company continued to build motor vehicles throughout World War I. Ferdinand Porsche became Managing Director in 1916. But after the end of the war in 1918 the economic situation was dire in the country and this took its toll on the company. By 1923 the company was nearly bankrupt and Ferry Porsche left the company. It was in 1923 when an Italian engineer Giovanni Marcellino arrived, he helped to rebuild the company with innovations to improve engines performance and by building cooperative alliances with other manufacturers most notably with Skoda and Fiat.
Right: Austro-Daimler radiator cap with company logo from about 1931 (170,978 bytes). On 31 March 1928 Puch merged with the Austro-Daimler bodywork plant. By 28 December 1928 the new company "Austro-Daimler Puchwerke Aktiengesellschaft" is entered in the Vienna register of companies. After the merger with Austro-Daimler the production of automobiles by Puch was ended however, bicycles and motorcycles continued in production then bearing the Puch trademark. By 1930 Europe was enveloped by the Great Depression and the market for the more upscale automobiles was adversely impacted, this caused a dramatic retraction by production throughout the industry. Regardless of the economic situation in 1931 the first of two new luxurious Austro-Daimler motor cars were introduced, the ADR 8 was followed in 1931 by the ADR 6. The ADR were designed by the team led by Karl Rabe the firms' research director, and employee who started with the company in 1913 at age seventeen and had succeeded Ferdinand Porsche. Just before the ADR cars came onto the market however, Rabe was hired away by Porsche to work at his company, remaining these until shortly before his death in 1968. Both of the ADR cars were well engineered and stylish. The ADR 8 Alpine features a 4,624 cc (4.6 litre) straight 8 cylinder SOHC gasoline engine producing 121 hp. Some fifty of the ADR 8 were made through the 1935 model year in the customers choice of either a Tourer (2 doors, 2+2 seating with a retracting top), or a Limousine (4 doors and 4 seats), a Cabriolet (2 doors, 2 seats convertible), or Saloon (4 doors, 4 seats). The ADR 6 Bergmeister, introduced in 1932, was a lighter weight model at about 3,200 lbs. Even with its 3,613 cc (3.6 litre) straight 6 in line SOHC engine, the ADR 6 was faster and with a 94 mph top speed, and better at climbing hills (hence 'mountain master') than the ADR 8. The ADR 6 was offered as Cabriolet, Tourer, or Saloon configuration with about fifty of these being completed. These were the last great civilian motor cars introduced under the Austro-Daimler trademark.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Austro-Daimler continued making civilian automobiles until 1934 when Austro-Daimler Puchwerke merged with Steyr-Werke AG to form "Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG"; this merger was registered in Vienna by 1935. The merger that produced Steyr-Werke AG made this one of the three largest manufacturing concerns in Austria in the 1930's. While the Depression no doubt limited the demand for the ADR 6 and ADR 8 motor cars, they continued to be available into 1935, even after the merger with Steyr. After the ADR production stopped in 1935, all automobile production by Austro-Daimler was ended as the facilities transitioned solely to the production of trucks as large as the ADGR a large 6x6 six wheel drive, and lorries (small towing or personnel carrying trucks). While Steyr continued with the production of consumer and military passenger vehicles and trucks.
Right: Steyr-Werke AG trademark (11,137 bytes). Those bicyles made after the merger in 1934 bear the name "Steyr-Daimler-Puch Aktiengesellschaft" engraved on the head badge, and this was embossed on some accessories too.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Die Deutsche Erd- und Steinwerke GmbH" (The German Earth and Stone Works Ltd.), known as DESt, was an SS owned company incorporated in Berlin on 29 April 1938. DESt's original mission was to operate stone quarries and brickworks to provide building materials for state construction projects. Its headquarters were in Sankt Georgen an der Gusen, a small town in Austria where it was convenient to manage operations of the original stone quarries at Gusen (nearby Steyr). At DESt facilities the pernicious principle of "Vernichtung durch Arbeit" or destruction of laborers through excessive hard work and poor conditions were conducted.
Right: Georg Meindl, Generaldirektor of Steyr Daimler Puch AG 1938-1945 (81,610 bytes). In 1938 the majority of Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG stock was owned by Creditanstalt-Bankverein (Credit Institution Bank Corporation). As the Steyr-Werke celebrated its 75th anniversary on 15 July 1939, Creditanstalt was being coerced into selling the arms company to Hermann Göering Works, and on 9 August 1938 Steyr-Daimler-Puch became a Reichwerke (government-owned) company. With the acquisition a new Board of Directors was instated with Dr. Wilhelm Voss as President and with Paul Pleiger appointed Vice President. The General Directorate relocated from Vienna to Steyr, and on 18 October 1938 Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG decided, at an extraordinary general meeting, to transfer the company's headquarters from Vienna in eastern Austria to Steyr. This relocation placed Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG management nearer to Germany and to other major German industrial companies. Part of this too was motivated by the sense at the time that Linz, the birthplace of Adolf Hitler, was to be reborn as a new major city with monumental projects that would have Linz rivaling Vienna and Budapest among other great European cities. Meindl nurtured his access to even more of those in the Nazi hierarchy, most notably fellow Austrian Dr. Ernst Kaltenbrunner (b. 4 Oct. 1903, d. 16 Oct. 1946). Kaltenbrunner born at Ried im Innkreis, near Braunau in Upper Austria. He was the son of a lawyer, educated in chemistry and then law at the State Realgymnasium in Linz and at Graz University. He graduated in 1926 with a Dr. jur hence he was Dr. Kaltenbrunner. Kaltenbrunner worked as a lawyer-candidate (apprentice), first at Salzburg and after 1928 at Linz. Joining the Austrian Nazi Party on 31 August 1931, the intelligent, tall (6'7") and imposing Kaltenbrunner promoted fast so that by mid 1935 he was appointed to head the Austrian SS. He assisted in the advance work for the Anschluss, and in recognition of his services on the day the Anschluss was secured Hitler (also Austrian born) promoted Kaltenbrunner to SS-Brigadefürhrer (Brigadier General) heading the SS Oberabschnitt Donau (SS Upper Danube section). Among his first tasks was to assist the development of Mauthausen. Kaltenbrunner was promoted yet again on 11 September 1938 to SS-Gruppenfürhrer.
Left: The gate to Konzentrationslager Mauthausen (70,924 bytes). The camps practiced "Vernichtung durch Arbeit" (extermination through labor) working prisoners to death; when a prisoner could no longer be productive, then if not killed on the spot they were sent to an infirmary which either dispatched them or passed them elsewhere to be murdered. Since 1940 a portable gas chamber was in use at Mauthausen to kill those prisoners who were judged surplus or no longer productive. But to meet the requirements to kill an increasing population, particularly after the invasion of Russia, on the orders of Ziereis a gas chamber was built. This was organized by Doctor SS-Hauptsturmführer (Captain) Dr. Erich Wasicky (b. 27 May 1911 in Vienna), the SS pharmacist, and went into operation with the cooperation of the garrison chief medical doctor SS-Hauptsturmfürhrer Eduard Krebsbach. Completed underground beneath the camp hospital this was camouflaged as a bathroom and operational in March 1942; using Zyklon B Giftgas (poison gas) this could murder up to about 120 prisoners at a time. In 1939 the foundation was laid to build a large ball-bearing factory in Steyr-Münichholz, and from then plans accelerated to put Steyr onto a war footing. Consider the growth that would be seen: in 1938 the company earned 57 million Reichsmark in sales but by 1943 that would increase by eight fold. Similarly the number of employees grew from about 7,000 in 1938 up to 50,000 in 1944 however, by 1944 every second on of those 'employees' was a prisoner from nearby concentration-camps, forced to labor at Steyr under the direction of Georg Meindl, a man who became among the most important corporate leaders in Nazi Austria. In the verdict of history it was later written:
By 1941 the Steyr factories experienced a shortage of laborers, particularly at the aircraft engine manufacturing plant. This lack of labor was due in part to conscription of able males for military service, the Nazi aversion to employing women in production roles over the first few years of the war, and the gradual firing and extermination of the Jewish workers and others deemed 'undesirable' and their families. This prompted Georg Meindl to consider alternate sources of labor. Konzentrationslager Mauthausen was only about 30 kilometers from Steyr, Meindl viewed that as a potential pool of free labor. Heretofore, the use of prisoners at factories had not been a common practice, so Meindl appears to have been the first industrialist to seek this out. Meindl negotiated with the SS leadership through channels from Kaltenbrunner and up to Himmler. Therefore, Meindl was authorized to use slave labor provided by the SS furthermore, he could coordinate the logistics directly with Kommandant Ziereis. Ziereis was among the more infamous members of the SS-Totenkopfverbände ("Death's-Head Units"), the SS organization responsible for administering the labor camps, Konzentrationslager (Concentration Camps), and death camps for the Third Reich. The SS would provide forced laborers on a daily basis that would be transported under guard by train to work at Steyr factories by day, and back to the camps in the evenings. This agreement made Steyr-Daimler-Puch among the early, if not the first, manufacturing concerns adopting the use of forced slave labor from concentration camps. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Above left (left to right): Reichsführer of the SS Heinrich Himmler, Kommandant Franz Ziereis, and SS-Gruppenfürhrer Ernst Kaltenbrunner visiting Mauthausen 27 April 1941 (77,182 bytes). Above right: SS-Totenkopfverbände men in front of prisoners on the parade ground in Mauthausen-Gusen, October 1941 (91,154 bytes). By the Spring of 1941 Steyr had about three hundred (300) slave male laborers provided by DESt working in positions related to the construction work of Steyr facilities including bomb shelters. Additional laborers were requested for Steyr. On 5 January 1942 Meindl wrote a letter to Kaltenbrunner recommending a new 'satellite' prison camp facility be constructed nearer to the Steyr factory. In this letter Meindl coldly reasoned this would reduce the travel distance so that more prisoners would be available to work for even more hours per day. Meindl went on to explain this would also reduce the number of German/Austrian security personnel that would otherwise be needed to manage transports and security to and from Mauthausen. In reply to his request the KZ-Nebenlager (concentration camp satellite) Steyr-Münichholz facility was completed by 14 March 1942; this was located about four kilometers from Steyr. It was 'staffed' by prisoners assigned from the main KL Mauthausen. The camp typically housed between 1,000 to 1,500 prisoners, but by April 1945 there were some 3,090 prisoners there working for the city and for Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG. By this time Steyr-Daimler-Puch was producing nearly ten percent of all rifles for the German war effort. For the city of Steyr too they labored, building roads and air-raid bunkers. Brigadeführer Meindl was fast becoming considered to be a sort of 'mini-Speer' (reference to Armaments Reichsminister Albert Speer) by some, a man who might even be qualified to manage the SS operated manufacturing industries. On 30 March 1943 Albert Speer visited Konzentrationslager Mauthausen-Gusen, this was his sole visit ever to a concentration camp. His VIP tour took about 45 minutes presenting the camp to him as a nearly 'idyllic' facility complete with flowers in vases in the one or two barracks he visited while diverting him and his retinue away from areas that might offend sensibilities. Speer was accompanied by Prof. Ferry Porsche and met with senior executives of the Steyr-Daimler-Puch and the Reichswerke Hermann Göering organizations. At the direction of Speer, on 30 April 1943 DESt signed an agreement with Steyr-Daimler-Puch AG allocating additional slave labor for wartime production. After meeting his old friend Reichsmarschall Göering at the airfield in Graz, Meindl sent a letter to Himmler on 14 July 1943 referring to that meeting and requesting an additional 2,000 prisoners to work at Flugmotorenwerke Ostmark (aircraft engine factory east) manufacturing facilities to be built in Wiener Nuedorf for the production of aircraft engines. Thus Konzentrationslager Wiener Neudorf was opened on 2 August on a two-acre site where the municipality of Guntramsdorf is now. Wiener Neudorf, with a peak capacity of nearly 3,000 people, was another one of what would become more than fifty sub-camps associated with Mauthausen. The Lagerkommandant (camp commander) of KZ-Nebenlager Steyr-Münichholz from 27 August 1943 to 6 May 1945 was SS-Obersturmführer Otto Heess, a German from Pforzheim. Heess was a German from Pforzheim who had been an office clerk by profession, and a member of the Nazi Party (NSDAP) since 1933. Heess had been an SS staff member at the main camp at Mauthausen from February 1940 to August 1943, this included a term as commander of the guard troops in the quarries of the Wiener Graben. By 1943 he promoted to Obersturmführer, that corresponded to the rank of Oberleutnant (Lieutenant) in the Wehrmacht (regular Army). Among the most cruel of the staff at Steyr-Münichholz was SS-Scharführer (Sergeant) Gottlieb Muzikant, from Mürau in present day Czechoslovakia, he was an SS-Sanitäter (medic) on staff known to torture prisoners "in every possible way" and murder prisoners by any one of several cruel methods including the injection of phenol. By the end of 1943 some 1,300 concentration camp prisoners worked for Steyr-Daimler-Puch in Arbeitskommandos (prisoner work details) at eight different production halls of Gusen. While some improvements to prisoner conditions over those at Mauthausen were granted in the interest of worker productivity, the overall poor nutrition combined with the hard work, at times in freezing cold with a lack of winter clothing, and absent medical care claimed their victims. So replacements were periodically called in. In time some 18 barracks (or halls) were established at Gusen under the commands "GEORGEN-MUEHLE I, II, III and IV" for some eight thousand five hundred (8,500) additional laborers working at the Steyr-Daimler-Puch underground factory built there in 1943. Steyr-Daimler-Puch, as did most other Reich Corporations, developed 'trustee sites' these were subcontractor facilities in Poland at Radom and Warsaw that relied on slave labor as well. By September 1944 production facilities in the area were gradually relocating to underground to provide better protection from air raids. Steyr-Daimler-Puch rented space at underground facilities from DESt, amounting to some 3,050 square meters by February 1945. Wartime slave labor from Mauthausen working for Steyr would peak at about three thousand ninety (3,090) by April 1945. These had worked on the production of weapons including the Karabiner K 98 rifle, the MP 44 and 45 assault guns, MG 42 machine gun, and airplane engines. Dr. Meindl was rewarded for his efforts again on 9 November 1944 with a promotion to SS-Brigadeführer, still with a status that conferred no line military authority.
Right: on 6 May 1945 liberated prisoners take down the gate keeper at the former KL Mauthausen (63,442 bytes). The Reckoning The prisoner death toll at the Mauthausen complex is estimated at between 122,766 and 320,000; records destroyed by the Nazis preclude a concise determination. So what became of all these big shots mentioned above and their minions? There would be some thirty-six major trials plus trials for twenty-five individuals. Known as the Mauthausen-Gusen Military Tribunal at Dachau, these were conducted to assess the participation and culpability of the 298 defendants from KL Mathausen-Gusen, it's sub and satellite camps. This series of trials resulted in 117 death sentences, 55 sentences for life imprisonment, 104 sentences for terms of from two to thirty years, and 22 acquittals. The first trail commenced on 7 March 1946 when sixty-one former Mauthausen camp personnel and collaborating prisoners ('Capos' who worked for the SS) were brought to trial before an American Military Tribunal in Dachau, Germany. The defendants were all charged with violation of the laws and usages of war, as well as with subjecting foreign nationals to killing, beating, torture, and starvation. The trial began 29 March and lasted only six weeks, with the court finding all sixty-one defendants guilty on 11 May concluding there was enough evidence of death by shootings, gassings, hangings and starvation to find every member of the camp personnel culpable. On 13 May the court sentenced fifty-eight of the defendants to death and gave the other three life sentences. Later, nine of the death sentences were reduced to life sentences. Those sentenced to death were hanged on 27 to 28 May 1947 in the yard of the Landsberg am Lech War Criminal Prison Nr. 1 (prison) in Bavaria.
The post war trials and many sentences generated significant controversy. Some in German circles claimed the allies had used the trials to defame the German people, while the church expressed concern about the death penalties in particular. There were questions raised, even within some Allies legal circles, about fairness and technicalities of the trials even for some whose crimes were obvious and clearly abominable. Then there was the problem of situational ethics, practices of governments including the USA trying to put the past behind them while trying to confront what they perceived as the threats to democracy from Stalin's Soviet Union. As a result several war criminals had their death sentence conveyed, or who had been sentenced to long terms were released well before the term was served. The Americans closed the Landsberg War Criminal Prison facility in 1958 and handed the building over to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Right: Steyr 380 Diesel-Lastkraftwagen advertisement (11,911 bytes).
Creditanstalt-Bankverein, the bank formerly holding stock in Steyr-Daimler-Puch before the war, was nationalized and then resumed operations including holding stakes in several important Austrian companies again including Steyr-Daimler-Puch. By 1949 cooperation agreements were being signed with manufacturers in western bloc nations, the first of these was one with Fiat of Turin, Italy. By 1953 Puch introduced two new motorcycles. In 1954 Puch introduced their first 'Moped' the MS 50, this economical two wheeled vehicle was well suited for the needs of European urban living at the time, this was the first of a decades long success story for the company. In May 1955 full independence by Austria was regained, and by then and throughout the next decade bicycles and Mopeds were manufactured in Graz, Austria and marketed in Europe as Puch.
Left: Embossed aluminum head badge of a Steyr bicycle, probably built about 1970 (92,616 bytes).
Right: Embossed aluminum head badge of a Puch bicycle, probably built about 1970 (26,892 bytes).
At the turn of the 1970's the Steyr-Daimler-Puch company was marketing entry level road and BMX bicycles. Each Steyr or Puch trademarked bicycle frame was being manufactured and assembled at Werk Graz-Thondorf, the Steyr Daimler Puch factory in Graz, Austria. By then the bicycles were being marketed on several continents and under one or more of the company brand names simultaneously: Steyr-Daimler-Puch, and Puch. To facilitate distribution they set up companies in several countries; for example sales and service in the United Kingdom were managed by Steyr-Daimler-Puch (Great Britan) Ltd., at Steyr-Puch House, 211 Lower Parliament Street in Nottingham.
Steyr trademarked bicycles made into the early 1970's included simpler frames with geometries dating to the pre-war era and of steel construction, these bore the head badge similar to that shown above at left. But even their best bicycle products at that time were less than impressively built, comparatively heavy and with contracted lower-end components branded Altenburger for example. Some retailers ordered bicycles for exported for sale under the retailers trademark with their respective brands or trade names including Sears for example decals and a head badge reading SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. MADE IN AUSTRIA. The most popular bicycle made by Steyr for Sears seems to have remained the Free Spirit advertised by then through at least 1973 as the "10-speed. It gets you there."
The Puch branded bicycles was initially reserved for frames sold in Austria or exported for sale in other European countries (Germany, France, England, etc.). The Puch branded offerings also included BMX models sold in Europe and destined for sale in the USA.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
The upsurge in bicycle sales from 1965 and into the early 1970's prompted the consortium to consider the production of mid and upper level bicycles, more sophisticated than those that had been their hallmark. The Arab Oil Embargo of October 1973 to March 1974 persuaded Steyr-Daimler-Puch management they might have a much larger market for their products in the USA, and so the Steyr Daimler Puch of America Corporation was established in Greenwich, Connecticut to manage the representation of the lines and provide constructive feedback to Austria. The importation and distribution of their products (including Mopeds, bicycles, and Steyr firearms) in the USA was to commence from locations in Secaucus, New Jersey and in Jacksonville, Florida. The product line would be marketed under the trade name Austro-Daimler. For most consumers the expectations were high when buying a bike associated with those great Austrian and German names! In order to better negotiate the complicated US marketplace and improve their offerings for the European market too, Steyr Daimler Puch America explored developing relationships with established bicycle distributors in the USA. First and foremost in their minds was Lifecycle, Inc., a well regarded and proved cycling retailer and distributor then located at 1005 Massachusetts Avenue, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The proximity of Lifecycle to the Steyr-Daimler-Puch offices in Greenwich, Connecticut added the benefit of convenience. Lifecycle distributed products to some 125 bicycle retail shops throughout New England and in California. Lifecycle was founded by the late Eugene (Gene) Ritvo, the company integrated a highly experienced team of technical and sales people. Among their many kudos Lifecycle had over many years developed a special relationship, beyond that of a typical regional distributor, with Fuji America based in New York City. Lifecycle helped to make the Nichebei Fuji group product an acclaimed and financially successful line - the first such Japanese bicycle manufacturer success story in the USA. Up to then imported bicycles were usually entry to mid level models marketed under westernized names, or made for American manufacturers to distribute under their own names. Fuji's business strategy differed, this was the brainchild of Ken Mizugaki, President of Fuji USA and a graduate of Reed College in the States. He and his closest, loyal, and competent associates (Ken Moriya, Yoshi Kitazumi, Katz Nishimura, Maury Shitanisi) stuck with their business plan to develop a premium line of bicycles and components made in Japan and retaining their Japanese identity, even while taking ridicule from fellow importers and distributors. The components makers included: Dia-Comp, Sun Tour, Nitto, Pearlizumi, Shimano, Silver Star, Sugino whose items were clearly identified. Gene had been so instrumental at improving the Fuji line by helping to determine production frame sizes, frame angles, tubing choice, and component groups that to this day he is considered by many to be the father of the Fuji line in the United States. By the early 1970's Consumer Reports magazine's "Best Buy" pick was the Special Road Racer, though the bike Fuji became best known for was the later version designated the S10-S, the 27 lb. ten-speed road touring bicycle introduced in 1971 selling for about $210. The successes eventually earned for the Fuji trademark the cache of Sony, Nikon, Seiko and the like. Lifecycle had a display wall lined with wonderful bikes by makers including: Masi, Cilo, Cinelli, Bob Jackson, Harry Quinn, Colnago, Fisher, Mooney, Merckx, Paramount, Teledyne Titan and several other state of the art frames for that 70's into the 80's era. Among the newcomers was Gary Klein, an MIT student who retailed his first Klein bicycles with boron-reinforced aluminum frames through Lifecycle. So the credentials of the team at Lifecycle were obvious. Steyr Daimler Puch America representatives arranged an introductory meeting with the principals of Lifecycle. Those attending included Lifecycle founders Gene, Thomas Manning, and Warren Koebler who has as much knowledge about bicycles, design, and cycle trivia as anyone in the business. Attending representatives of Steyr-Daimler-Puch included Robert Yung a Chinese American marketing fellow here by way of Brazil, Helmut Quindt from Graz who was technically knowledgeable and represented the manufacturing side of Steyr-Daimler-Puch, and Silvio Simon an advertising specialist from France. The meeting conveyed how Steyr-Daimler-Puch of Austria intended to develop a new product line of bicycles with the better components, more upscale than those they were known to have manufactured up that time. These bicycles would bear the Austro-Daimler tradename and continue within the production serial number sequence already in effect at the factory, hence there was nothing in the serial number to distinguish a Puch frame from one to be marketed as Austro-Daimler; these new bicycles were to be seen as among the best that Europe could offer. In time there would be Puch trademarked road bikes, these offerings were to represent the lower priced offerings of the maker. While there was some some minor overlap of the features between the trademarks road bikes.
It had been decades since a product had borne the Austro-Daimler trade name, but by 1975 bicycles bearing that name were starting to be noticed among cycling circles:
They put forth a proposal to Lifecycle that focused on developing a presence and sales strategy for the US market. Lifecycle would exclusively distribute the line in the USA to retailers, and would also retail the Austro-Daimler and Puch lines directly to their clientele. The product line would be initially launched in New England because of its perceived affluence and existing strong bike market. If the business worked out well in New England then they would expand nationally. Lifecycle signed a three year contract with Steyr Daimler Puch USA to conduct sales, marketing, and perform design consulting work then commenced their work. The team at Lifecycle actually specified the entire Austro-Daimler line, even down to the then unique custom-cut foam packing. They proposed frame designs (tubing choice, lugs, frame angles, etc.) with the desired frame component lists, and made suggestions for models to be offered to suit the various price points and their intended customers. Gene Ritvo was almost fanatical about paint quality and through his input the Fuji finishes were applied electro-statically and became regarded as being among the best in the industry. Gene might spend weeks agonizing over getting just the right shade of color or component choices for new models. A great deal of credit should also go to Warren Koebler, an associate at Lifecycle, for his work in choosing group components and his love of the minutiae in specifying a bike model; Warren is still in the bicycle business working with Belmont Wheelworks. The Lifecycle team with Gene in particular put heart and soul into this design effort, they helped to bring Steyr-Daimler-Puch bicycle design into the modern age. One of the persons who was then with the Lifecycle company related:
After that good deal of forethought and preparation at Lifecycle, Gene Ritvo made the first of several trips to Graz, Austria to discuss these matters directly with production management and technicians. Gene also had in hand his big passion: color charts. Gene was proudest of development of the Ultima, their top line model originally finished in a red termed "Bordeaux Red", then later in the distinctive purple aubergine color, and the Superleicht model, the unprecedented all black Vent Noir with black finished components, later followed by the lustrous smoked chrome Vent Noir II (sometimes marketed as the Vent Noir). Several of the suggestions by Lifecycle were also rolled over by Steyr-Daimler-Puch into a then undisclosed, overlapping line of Puch brand bike models. The Austro-Daimler bicycles models shared a fairly standardized geometry but differed in several ways. These differences involve the selection of frame materials (tube alloy or steel for example), construction hardware and techniques including choice of frame coupling hardware and brazing technique and materials (silver brazing for example), Gruppo or group of components selected by make and degree of sophistication, finishing work such as hand painted trim and including type of seat and handlebar grip material. The top of the line Austro-Daimler bicycle was marketed as the Ultima but at later times bore the label "ULTIMA superleicht". These were basically an upgraded Superleicht (super light) frame made of Reynolds 531 alloy but with the lighter weight Campagnolo Super Record series components. By 1977 the product line-up published by Steyr Daimler Puch of America Corporation was:
By 1978 the Ultima incorporated: full titanium Super Record group (including their rare recently revised rear Derailleur), Campagnolo Horizontal Dropouts and the Fork Tips, a Regina Oro chain and sprocket, lightweight Fiamme Ergal polished 7075 aluminum 700c tubular racing rims (averaging 296 g each), a taped Cinelli Bar and with a Cinelli Stem, and with a Unicanitior Model 3 Saddle.
Left: The Ultima in Thorndorf-Purple, the bicycle that put Austro-Daimler on the radar (32,980 bytes). The Ultima frame was offered in a dark purple metallic color advertised as "Thorndorf-Purple", referring to Werk Graz-Thondorf the factory where the frames were made, with gold painted trim. In Europe too the Ultima were marketed under the Steyr-Daimler-Puch trademark bearing the model label "ULTIMA", also finished in Thorndorf-Purple. In 1978 the frame was also made available in Amethyst, a metallic silver-light lavender color and with black painted trim. In later years other color choices were added including Green and Burgundy. The retail price of the 1977 Ultima was a then whopping $1,275 though they might be had as late as in 1981 for about $1,600 new. Regardless of the cost, the Ultima appealed to that segment of the market that demanded the lightest (about 19.5 lbs. complete) and the finest regardless of cost. Great care was taken to present the product line as something special and elegant: There were initially glitches with some designs and production aspects of these new and more advanced frames, among them was a full size range of bikes all sporting the same length top tube. There are some early production frames with rough or obvious filing marks, most notably the underside of the Bottom Bracket. All of these matters were gradually worked out. There have been some comments made about the durability of some components such as the often misunderstood lightweight (c. 290g each) Fiamme Ergal tubular rims; these are superb in racing but are not the most durable choice for casual riding along uneven surfaces as typically encountered by the casual rider. The term 'Tubular Rim' refers to the arrangement whereby the tire is sewn-up then glued onto the tim; this is not the easy to repair tire and inner tube set as are installed onto the more common 'Clincher Rim'. The tubular rim was preferred until recent years over the clincher rim, particularly among racers who run on smooth clean surfaces, because the tubular rim with tire weigh less than the clincher set. The tubular tire could (at the time) operate at higher pressures of up to 200 psi than a comparable clincher set at up to 150 psi, thus providing less rolling resistance. With less weight there is less rotational inertia on the wheel, and so a bicyclist riding on tubular rim and tire can accelerate faster and or with less effort than with a typical clincher. Of course in casual riding the benefits of light weight are offset by the need to carry a spare tubular tire, instead of the simple patch kit to repair the inner tube of a clincher rim.
Left: Embossed aluminum head badge on the author's Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II (18,250 bytes). Steyr Daimler Puch America opened a store in Greenwich, Connecticut that was then a rather unique concept: a flagship single-brand store for the Austro-Daimler bicycles. The original bicycle shop on the site was owned by Chet Ribner and Rob Feldon, they negotiated the arrangement to convert their own store to a purpose built operation laid out to impress the visitor and feature solely the Austro-Daimler bicycles and accessories. As related "it had AD logo wallpaper etc and was quite an operation, boutiquey and rather snotty in nature... so Greenwich!" In time Rob Feldon ended up going to work in China to establish sources for the production of Puch brand bicycles. At this time Schwinn Bicycle Company was the dominant manufacturer of bicycles in the USA. Taiwan based Giant Manufacturing Co. Ltd. was manufacturing Schwinn-labeled outsourced bikes, often bearing the label Schwinn Approved. Sales to Schwinn represented almost all (ninety percent or more) of Giant's production. In 1979, Edward R. Schwinn Jr., became President of the Schwinn company then made Giant's owners uneasy as Schwinn attempted to have their bikes sourced at even lower cost from either eastern Europe or mainland China. By 1986 the Giant company decided to become self-reliant, dropping the relationship with Schwinn and instead marketing under their own trade name. Chet Ribner went to work for Giant, then became President of Giant in the US; this ended the ability of the Steyr-Daimler-Puch showroom in Greenwich to survive. Giant Manufacturing Co. Ltd. went on to become one of if not the world's largest bicycle manufacturer with facilities in Taiwan, The Netherlands, and China. Their experience in the defense industry crossed over and in 1978 Puch designed the world's first carbon-frame bicycle. The Austro-Daimler trademark was reserved for bicycles sold in the US market, hence those competing as an American market mens team rode 'A-D' labeled frames - usually the 'Ultima' model. While Puch was the label of frames sold in Europe, and for those competing as the Eurpoean market team and for the American Women's team. I have seen Austro-Daimler team racing advertisements, and have seen their tasteful jerseys from 1976 and from 1977. The Late 1970's, Early 1980's As mentioned previously, the USA experienced a dramatic bicycle sales boom starting in 1965 and cresting by 1975. The period was followed by a sudden decline in sales as the market became saturated by competitors and clogged with large inventories of unsold bicycles. This was unfortunate for bicycle makers, particularly those trying to become established in the US market including Austro-Daimler and Puch brands. As if the slowing sales overall in the highly competitive bicycle market was not enough, by 1976 the American consumer had forgot the oil crisis and became acclimated to the higher fuel prices. So they resumed favoring larger and less fuel efficient vehicles. Most of those Americans who would ever opt for a motorized two-wheeler shunned the Puch Mopeds (still popular in Europe) and other similar vehicles in favor of full sized motorcycles. As a result of this the sales of Puch Mopeds in the USA never really got off the ground. The Moped distributor for Puch was a company based in upstate New York that dealt with the sales of snowmobiles and farm equipment. This was a capable and successful company in those fields, but their sales of motorized wheeled goods reflected the Moped market in the USA - dismal. Not long after picking up the Puch Moped distributorship they concluded this would not work for then, so they liquidated their existing inventory and got out of the Moped business altogether. By the late 1970's the remaining operators of Lifecycle agreed to continue distributing the Austro-Daimler line even in the face of the market slowdown, some changes of staff, and increasing number of new manufacturers from overseas competing for the US bicycle market. Steyr-Daimler-Puch sought ways to remain competitive and pursue the lower priced market areas. Lifecycle would also continue to retail (sell directly to customers) the line as well as remain involved with the design, specifications, and other decision making. To meet the growing demand Steyr-Daimler-Puch ramped up employment and production; their quantitative peak was attained in 1980 when their more than 3,200 employees produced 310,000 bicycles.
Steyr-Daimler-Puch in Austria continued to produce bicycles based on their own designs that were old, but yet marketable particularly in Europe. Consider the single-speed 1939 bicycle (SN 481104) trade-marked 'Johann Puch AG' bearing the painted 'JPAG' head badge plate, alongside a similarly single-speed made about 1980 Puch Elegance. Shown here are versions made to accommodate women for easier comparison of the similarities of: frame geometry, spring-loaded saddle (seat), design and location of the thumb bell, even down to the Bosch brand of power generator and headlamp:
Arguably the most refined decades-old bicycle technology still in production! I would guess that by this time Steyr Daimler Puch in Graz was ramping up their interest in making this effort a success, and if they did not already have the engineers on staff with bicycle design or materials knowledge when they started this new effort then they were certainly hiring them. Rudolf Resch was an engineer and Chief Designer, while Franz Volk could become Chief Production Manager; their faces and promises appeared in the factory literature. So if SDP needed hand-holding, then I expect this would not be the case for long. That said, their marketing team know how certainly was lacking and remained lacking throughout the term of their efforts into the mid 1980's. The Steyr Daimler Puch bicycle product labeling and differentiation is about as confusing as that which any maker has ever attempted:
I call these grounds for "mismanagement alerts"; read on to learn more about this.
Steyr-Daimler-Puch headquarters decided to source some of their new bicycles from factories overseas so that they could offer these to the customer for a cost lower than those made in Austria. These third party sources were initially in Japan and in Taiwan. One may come across one of these contracted bicycles from Asia bearing a "PUCH" head badge but with smaller letters "MADE FOR" over the Puch name. Some miscommunications apparently developed between the managements of Lifecycle and Steyr-Daimler-Puch. Lifecycle understood the new lower priced bicycles would bear the Puch name, and this would help to round out their market offerings. Lifecycle had worked diligently to present the Austro-Daimler trademark as representative of upper crust European fare; for their strategy to work there could be no overlap with Puch - no models even remotely competitive to those bearing the Austro-Daimler trademarks. When the first shipment of these lower priced bicycles arrived at Lifecycle the staff observed an additional load of bicycle cartons labeled 'PUCH' that bore several different model names on the cartons. Upon inspecting the shipment it became clear these Puch models had indeed overlapped most of the Austro-Daimler models, with some of the Puch models costing well over the $1,000 retail price point. This was perceived by Lifecycle as a complete violation of the design and consultantcy agreement. There was likely more to the dynamics of this story than I know, but it appears this episode exacerbated the issue of already compromised trust, and the value Lifecycle had placed in Steyr-Daimler-Puch as a venture partner ended. Lifecycle withdrew almost immediately as the distributor for the new Austro-Daimler line. With that break Steyr Daimler Puch America lost access to the better retailers in New England, and became deprived of American consumer based design advice. The Puch overlap with Austro-Daimler progressed so that Puch too would also offer some very fine road models in the USA, with some noteworthy competitive teams riding Puch trademarked frames. This complicated the matter of discriminating between their own competing trademarks: time here for another 'mismanagement alert'. Steyr Daimler Puch America found out the idea to parallel Puch and Austro-Daimler was confusing customers, and wasteful of advertising to get the message across. Added to that, the choice by Steyr Daimler Puch America of a new bicycle distributor, replacing Lifecycle, was a disaster; the new distributor charged high storage fees, became slow to pay, and did not even approach the overly optimistic predictions for sales volume they promised. Eventually Steyr Daimler Puch America parted with that distributor, then called again upon Lifecycle to at least help repatriate their US inventory from the new distributor and into lower cost storage. But Lifecycle declined to go any further with the relationship than that. Steyr Daimler Puch America Corporation proceeded to establish distribution relationships directly with retailers, in some regions hiring a local District Sales Manager to aid their efforts to market the bicycles and mopeds. By the Summer of 1977 John B. Cellier was their Director of Operations. As their point of contact for the bicycle stores, Cellier was also referring customers who inquired to their nearest retailer. The beautiful Austro-Daimler sales literature, advertisements, and the recognition brought by an increasing number of competitive bicyclists riding the Austro-Daimler and Puch bikes helped to attract even more of those specialty bicycle shops that catered to the more demanding cyclist to contact Steyr Daimler Puch America Corp.. But ironically, while Steyr Daimler Puch America was trying to nurture relationships with bicycle stores, SDP America also sold bicycles directly to the consumer; I have seen sales receipts from 1980 written at Steyr Daimler Puch America in Greenwich - earning them yet another 'mismanagement alert'. I purchased my Vent Noir II in 1981 from College Park Bicycles in Maryland, though my bicycle frame serial number indicates it was made in 1978.
Right: later production model Vent Noir II frame with "Steyr Austro-Daimler Puch" decal on the seat tube. With less hand painted trim this frame is not finished as elaborately as its predecessors. The frame downtube bears the decal "Made by Puch AUSTRO-DAIMLER". It bears a metal Puch head badge, this is embossed and then painted but in a simpler manner than the one shown above right (170,122 bytes). Back in Austria there were some efforts to make the available bicycle line more diversified in terms of choices, and in terms of pricing too. Efforts to offer less costly bicycles in the line including outsourcing of some road bicycles. Up to about this time the manufacture of most Puch and all Austro-Daimler road bicycles had remained at Graz in Austria. However, in order to compete in the lower-priced areas of the market the production of some Puch models, including the durable Pathfinder bicycles, were shifted from being made in Austria to Japan under contract to Araya Industrial Company. Other Puch models were outsourced to Kuwahara Company of Japan; the company is better known for making BMX bikes marketed under their own name including the forty red and white KZ frame model bikes made famous in the 1982 Steven Spielberg movie E.T.
Left: Head badges of 1980's Japanese made bicycles. At left is one from a c. 1980 Pathfinder made by Araya bearing PUCH, while at right is the MADE FOR PUCH head badge of a Kuwahara-made Model 190 from about 1986 (29,385 bytes). Note how these outsourced frames both frature riveted-on metal plates, not the cheaper stick-on label sometimes found on Puch and Austro-Daimler bicycles made in Austria.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
On 2 June 1980 Andrew Teisher Weaver won the Buckeye Race for the Gold (part of Olympic qualifying trials) with a 37:03 time for the 30 Kilometer time trial riding Austro-Daimler. He went on to become a nine-time National Cycling Champion. In 1979 four members of the U.S. Olympic Team and five members of the U.S. National team were riding on Austro-Daimler bicycles. By 1981 they were racking up really notable wins: Winner of the Self Magazine Series, Coor's Classic Women's Individual Winner, Coors Classic Team Winner, National Champion of the Women's Individual Time Trial, and National Champion at the Women's Road Race. Three members of the U.S. Worlds Team rode these frames too. Connie Carpenter won riding for Team Puch. She is among the most highly regarded women athletes for her win of the National Road Championship and two-points championships in 1981. She appears prominently in the 1982 Austro-Daimler catalog. She was also the national two-points champion in June 1982, and criterium champion in 1982 and 1983. As reported in the newspapers in the Summer of 1982 "Connie Carpenter was on top of things all the way as she won her second consecutive Coors Classic, the world's longest, toughest -and richest- cycling event for women. Carpenter set a world record of 3:49.53 in winning the 1983 world pursuit championship. The following year, she became the first U.S. cyclist since 1912 to win an Olympic medal. These wins were reflected in the advertising literature as shown below. By the mid 1980's a decision was made by Steyr-Daimler-Puch in Austria to unify their overseas bicycle marketing efforts behind the Puch name alone. Puch continued to be the trademark in most European markets, while the brand would be marketed as "Puch Austro-Daimler" in the USA. The last of the production Austro-Daimler bicycle frames of this time bear the Puch head badge and with the decal "Made by Puch AUSTRO-DAIMLER" along the frame downtube. These frames may also bear the "Steyr Austro-Daimler Puch" decal on the Seat Tube as shown above right. Later production Puch and Austro-Daimler frames may have a stick-on decal applied instead of the formerly embossed metal head badge plate, apparently a cost cutting decision. But oddly enough I have seen earlier production frames too with the stick-on 'PUCH' or 'A-D' decal applied, so these may have been applied if/when the factory ran out of the metal embossed head badge. A photograph published in the 23 July 1982 edition of Velonews shows Connie Carpenter winning the 1982 Coors Classic, she is seen just edging out Jeanie Longo; Connie is riding the green Puch frame labeled clearly as such in bold white letters - but that frame has an "A-D" head badge.
Click on images to see enlarged views (94,762 then 59,559 and 87,409 bytes) Das Ende of AD In spite of the favorable reviews of the products by 1984 Steyr-Daimler-Puch realized it was becoming more and more difficult to be competitive given their overhead costs. The interest by management in the production of two wheeled vehicles in Austria, even those made for the European market, tapered off as Asian-made products flooded in. Ironically the Plaza Accord signed on 22 September 1985 between the governments of France, West Germany, Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom, pushed production from Japan to even lower cost countries. The signatories agreed to depreciate the U.S. dollar in relation to the Japanese Yen and the German Deutsche Mark by intervening in currency markets. The exchange rate value of the US dollar versus the Yen for example declined by 51% from 1985 to 1987. The changing world economics and the slowing sales of bicycles overall at this period was making many manufacturers scramble to find less costly sources of the most economically priced bicycles. While Steyr-Daimler-Puch still had relationships with Japanese factories, other makers were scrambling to sources in Taiwan and elsewhere.
Right: the last Puch 'Made In Austria', a Royal Force model, is inspected by Steyr employee Josef Benze (51,786 bytes). While Austro-Daimler parts and designs and some staff and marketing people went to Bianchi, the rights to use the name 'Austro-Daimler' were never transferred to Piaggio. Some bicycles bearing the 'Puch' name continued in production at Bianchi through 1995 when the Puch name rights were sold to first a company in the Netherlands, and later to a company in Sweden. By 2003 bicycles bearing the Puch name were again available, some made with aluminum frames coming from Taiwan and components from Asian providers. These could be found being distributed through Cycleurope Deutschland GmbH in Europe for example.
As I understand it, the rights to the name Austro-Daimler were not conveyed to Bianchi when Puch was sold. Either General Dynamics or Case Corporation would have acquired the rights to the Austro-Daimler trade name and trademarks when that part of Steyr that owned Austro-Daimler was acquired. There is no easy way to know what if any contemporary Austro-Daimler bicycle or clothing gear is legally trademarked or officially licensed. However, since May 2001 IVM Technical Consultants, an Austrian company, has registered the Internet Domain name 'Austro-Daimler.com'; most recently this domain remains basically parked and inactive. A US-based, Made in Taiwan AD? In the last months of 2010 and into early 2011 a New England-based bicycle company with an E-Bay store announced they were looking into having new bicycle frames of carbon fiber supposedly made in Taiwan to be sold bearing the Austro-Daimler trademark. The example frames and artwork shown on-line by the American company bear the Austro-Daimler trade name in the Auriol style font, and with a stick-on or painted-on AD head badge logo. These are represented to be MCR-01 carbon road frames manufactured by More Choice Inc. of Taiwan, a company heretofore unknown to the author but with shipments to the USA originating from locations including Yantian, China. In tracing the history of the original company and its trade name it would be interesting to know how or from whom the rights to use the name 'Austro-Daimler' were obtained, if this permission was obtained at all. In my opinion, whether or not the bikes are good this practice just goes to show again how some people can miss the point, compromising principles for personal gain or sentiment by essentially 'whoring out' the exclusivity or heritage of a product. Such efforts can never recover whatever values of the past, at least as long as the frames do not bear 'Made In Austria'.
In addition to the original Austro-Daimler jerseys and other gear that I have seen appear on occasion in the used market, there appear to be some contemporary interpretations of Austro-Daimler apparel being sold today. Among the contemporary third party Austro-Daimler gear I have seen is a jersey shown below (front and back), and the sewn patch:
2. the Vent Noir and Vent Noir II were marketed with various component groups and components (by Shimano, Campagnolo, etc.). 3. earlier Austro-Daimler trademarked models bear the "AD" head badge. But by about 1983 the Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II sold bear the Puch head badge. 4. some later models bear "by Puch" alongside the Austro-Daimler name, and these were sold bearing the Puch head badge. The 'Austro-Daimler' and European market 'Puch' Vent Noir ten speed bicycles were originally provided with Shimano Dura Ace components with parts of these anodized black, Weinmann hubs and wheel rims, and with 'Regina Oro' cassette and chain in gold finish. The Austro-Daimler Vent Noir frames I have seen in the USA have a bit more elegant trim than the Puch models sold here, with the Austro-Daimler having gold pinstripes and with gold detailing of the Lugs (painted by hand) in a manner similar to my own Vent Noir II. Apparently the details and components of the Vent Noir components varied depending on their Puch or Austro-Daimler designation, or where they were to be sold - in Europe or USA for example, or from year to year. I have seen early 1980's factory Puch literature showing an 18 speed version of the Austro-Daimler Vent Noir in black frame and with 'PUCH' vertically engraved on the frame Top Stay tips, and where the components changed to the T/A Cyclo Tourist crank, Duo-Par titanium rear Derailleur, and Weinmann Carrera side pull brakes, 'Regina Oro' cassette and chain in gold finish; this was listed as weighing 22 lbs. The original Vent Noir was joined in 1978 with the release of the Vent Noir II which is in fact not finished in black and neither were it's components. Both the Vent Noir and the Vent Noir II frames were assembled in Austria incorporating Reynolds 531 (pronounced "five-three-one") Manganese-Molybdenum alloy tube stock sourced from 'Tubes Investments Reynolds Limited' of Birmingham, England. I have seen the earliest production Vent Noir II with Shimanon tips and drop-outs. The frame of the Vent Noir II were chromed, treated with a process that produced the dark golden green 'smoked chrome' appearance. Even though in 1978 the Vent Noir II was marketed as "The All European Limited Edition" (see the brochure near the end of this article) I find it curious to note the 1978 and 1981 brochures lists it being delivered with Shimano components; the 'all Euro' claim probably was devised by the same fellow who did not know the meaning of 'vent noir'.
Left: Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II detail of Top Stay Tip, Professional Series Bocama Lug, and Campagnolo Seat Binder Bolt. Note iridescence of the anodizing, and hand painted gold trim and inlaid stamped lettering (52,688 bytes).
On the earlier and later production Puch and Austro-Daimler Vent Noir and Vent Noir II series frames than mine this engraving on the Top Stay Tips may have been omitted, the area left flat. I have seen one Vent Noir, that I can not date, where the 'AD' appears to be a decal applied to the Tips. Austro-Daimler frames made in mid 1980's may have the Top Stay tubes attached to the lug with their tips welded into the rear of the Seat Tube Lug and with no flat area at all.
Right: Late production Puch Vent Noir II Top Stay Tip, unknown Lug, and unknown make of Seat Binder Bolt. Note flat Stay Top with no lettering, there is none of the hand painted gold trim treatment as was formerly provided, and there is no "MADE IN AUSTRIA" decal as was usual above the Reynolds Decal (52,688 bytes). Another fine touch for many of these frames is the hand painted trim around the upper brazed lug and tube joints, pin striping along parts of the tubes and forks, and paint inlay of the lettering stamped on the Top Stay tube tips. On the Vent Noir II this is a gold tone paint (as seen in the image above left), while on other frames it could be some other contrasting color. On the early production Vent Noir II and on the later production frames the hand painted pin striping accents along some tubes and around the lugs was scaled back, and on later production frames this labor-intensive detailing would eventually be completely omitted. This detailing is absent on the frame shown above right, and is also missing on an earlier production Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II (Serial No. 6019869) than mine for example. Early to mid production Puch and Austro-Daimler road frames tended to incorporate either complete Campagnolo or Shimano sets of Dropouts and Fork Tips. The later production Puch and Austro-Daimler frames may incorporate Horizontal Dropouts and Fork Tips or other components made by yet another supplier: Gipiemme S.R.L. Gipiemme (sometimes misread 'Giriemme') is a manufacturer founded in 1964 by Giovanni Bernardi at Milano, Italy. Production is based in Loria near Treviso, Italy. Their offices are in Vicenza, not far from Campagnolo headquarters. Gipiemme developed their own products, mostly as a less costly alternative to the top line Campagnolo. Gipiemme was at times subcontracted by Campagnolo to manufacture parts for Campagnolo's lower tier Gruppo's. However, in terms of performance Gipiemme's best 'Special' components Gruppo competed directly against the best made by Campagnolo. They showed signs of being an innovator as late as in 1984 when they became the first company to offer Rims made of carbon fiber. Gipiemme S.R.L. was sold in 1989 and since then have pared down their offerings to focus on the production of Saddles, Rims and Wheels. I have seen some Puch branded frames made in Austria after 1981 that incorporate a mix of components, one for example with Gipiemme Dropouts and yet with Campagnolo Fork Tips. I do not understand why this would have occurred; could it be there was simply a shortage of one component set at a supplier, or a mix-up of frame and forks during assembly? Or, was this indicative of a problem with the procurement or inventory process at Stery-Daimler-Puch?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
The Vent Noir II was in production through 1981 but by 1982 appears to have been discontinued both in the USA and Europe, it is not listed in subsequent sales literature. However, the latest version of the black Vent Noir reappears in the line for 1982. In Europe the last of the production matte black Vent Noir bicycles bear the "STEYR-DAIMLER-PUCH" gold decal on either side of the Down Tube, with some gold pinstripe accents around some lugs, with a Puch sick-on decal instead of the metal head badge as provided on earlier models. The components may have varied but I have seen some of these bicycles with the trademark black anodized Shimano Dura Ace 53T chainring with crankset and front derailleur, with Shimano Crane rear derailleur, Shimano Drop-Outs, Shimano or Weinmann brakes, Suntour SR or Gipiemme stem and handlebar, Corsaire 313 San Marco saddle, Regina Oro chain, Fiamme 27 inch rims with Continental 'Sprinter' or 'Gatorskin' tires.
Right: Puch Vent Noir Aero made with the Reynolds 531 'Speed Stream' tapered frame (31,044 bytes). Note the lack of hand painted gold trim. Furthermore, the Top Stay Tip is flat and with no 'PUCH' embossed. The last new model of the series was introduced in 1982, marketed as the Puch Vent Noir Aero though labeled Vent Noir. This model is built with the Reynolds 531 'Speed Stream' tapered frame Tubes. Their most distinctive visual features are the tapered Down and Seat Tubes; as their diameter widens towards the middle of each tube and narrows to the standard diameter to fit into the frame lug. Otherwise these resemble the Vent Noir II of the 1980-81 era, finished with the same smoked chrome process with some frames appearing a bit lighter in tone, more towards silver. These were factory-equipped with the Shimano Dura Ace AX components gruppo. The Top Tube bears the decal Vent Noir, and the 'PUCH' head badge is affixed. The Puch Vent Noir Aero were marketed for sale only in Europe. I have observed changes of the factory issued Vent Noir series frame finishes of this period. For example the Puch branded Vent Noir bicycles that came into production with the aero tube frame no longer were made in black and with black finished group components, but instead these have a matte chromed finish that is more like a satin chrome than the greenish-gold frame of my Vent Noir II. The Vent Noir II frames in production by 1980, Austro-Daimler and Puch alike, similarly have a frame finish that are no longer the greenish-gold tone. Other frames too could be ordered with the 'smoked chrome' finish. By 1981 or 1982 it appears that one could order the Vent Noir frame in a greenish-blue teal painted finish; I have seen one such frame SN 7012580 and the paint does appear factory issued. The factory 1983 literature shows the Vent Noir model in production and with the option of ordering the Superleicht model also in smoked chrome. However, by 1985 all models of the Vent Noir in black, otherwise painted, or chromed, had been discontinued.
Above: The Austro-Daimler and Puch trademarked Vent Noir bicycles.
From the moment that I first gazed upon it in the showroom the Vent Noir II was a sight to behold, and it remains so to this day. The elegant appearance of this bike attracted me to it immediately. And even though at the time I knew nothing about Puch or Austro-Daimler bicycles, my knowing that it was made in Austria and also related to Daimler was reassuring. The 57cm frame geometry is a perfect fit for me. It is tastefully appointed in its finish and markings; this is less and less common for bikes made in recent years when their frames are often splashed with every form of commercial trademark to sell this or that from any conceivable angle. The tips of the frame Top Stay tips of my Vent Noir II are engraved with "AD" in a vertical arrangement, and with the "AD" Head Plate (shown above right). And instead of being painted as most other bikes are, the Vent Noir II's entire frame and fork were chemically treated with a hard anodizing process producing a durable dark golden greenish brown color described as "Smoked Chrome" in the literature. Rarely have I seen such an elegant frame tubing treatment; photos can not do it justice as the finish of the frame appears to take on subtle tone changes reflecting varying times of day and differing surroundings while joint (lug) areas appear almost iridescent. On 7 May 1981 I bought this ten speed road bicycle from Larry Black the founder and owner of College Park Bicycles in Maryland.
A complete Reynolds tubeset included the top tube, seat tube, downtube, chainstays, seat stays, two fork blades, a head tube, and a steerer, but NOT the lugs. The assembled frames weigh between four and a half (4-1/2) lbs.; they can weigh more depending on the intended application. This complete Vent Noir II would have left the factory weighing about 23 lbs. I have not weighed it since I added accessories then later changed the components over to all Campy, but it sure does feel lighter and more agile.
Right: Lugs made by Bocama of France as used to connect the tubes of my Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II bicycle.
Some professional builders feel Lugs within 1° of another can be interchanged. It is likely that Bocama would make Lugs to various other custom specifications if the ordered quantity justified it.
Left: Campagnolo 'Record' Model 1010/A Fork Tips and Dropouts as installed on my Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II bicycle.
The Bottom Bracket Shell of my Vent Noir II is engraved with the frame Serial Number (6164001), and above this number in smaller type are "A 11" upside down relative to the Serial Number; I do not know what the A 11 indicates. The shell also has the letter "E" stamped near the Crank Bearing indicating this is threaded 1.370" X 24 tpi and with a standard 68mm wide shell; these specifications set are known for short as the British Standard.
The British specification set was also known as the BSA standard after Birmingham Small Arms who developed the standard. This British standard has since been adopted by the ISO, the International Organization for Standardization and is most the common spec for production bicycles. While Puch certainly provided frames threaded with the British standard, I have seen some Puch frames of this era made with either Italian or French standard threaded Bottom Bracket with the appropriate stamp on the Bottom Bracket shell indicating French threading for example with 'F'. I have not seen any Austro-Daimler frame with any other than the British standard threading, as mine is indicated by the 'E' stamp, or some earlier frames bearing the letter 'B'. There also seems to be some indication of frame size reflected by the numbers stamped onto the Bottom Bracket Shell near the Serial Number of many but not all Austro-Daimler and Puch frames. For example Puch frame No. 701258x bears the numbers '863', possibly reflecting it is a 63cm frame. Another Puch, No. 6760804, has the stamped numbers '857' on the shell of this 57cm frame. I have read comments that some owners of Austro-Daimler bicycles complained about rough file marks, rust, etc. on earlier production frames but my AD frame shows none of this, and so it is possible this is wrong or could be found only on some frames. My Vent Noir II was manufactured probably in 1978, towards the middle of the Austro-Daimler Puch production after early lessons learned by the craftsmen had most likely been implemented.
The components needed to complete the bicycle as it was originally set up were sourced by Austro-Daimler from well regarded makers including: Campagnolo, Cinelli, and Regina Oro of Italy, from Avocet in France, and Weinmann then of Belgium and Switzerland. Anyone who appreciates fine craftsmanship and mechanics could have little bad to say about the Austro-Daimler Vent Noir II of this period as it was delivered to the retailer when new. This bicycle's most critical components were beautifully machined made by Campagnolo ('Campy') and originally it was made up with components from their Gran Sport Gruppo (a mid priced grouping) including: 42/53 Crankset, front and rear Derailleur, Shift Levers, front and rear wheel quick release Hubs, Brakes, Pedals. The Wheel Rims are aluminum alloy 700c clincher (Presta valves) were made by Weinmann, the 1/2" x 3/32" Chain and the 14/24 Freewheel were made by Regina Oro and when new appeared as though they were plated in gold - this nice appearance lasts for a few miles of riding as I recall. The comfortable black leather seat (Saddle) was made by Avocet.
Covering the grip areas of the 'Giro D'Italia' are precisely hand-stitched black leather covers made by Almarc of Italy; to this day I have not found the equal of this leather work for bicycles. The leather is made as a pair with two strips rectangularly cut as wide as the circumference of the handlebar, and the holes are punched for the thread. As I read it described "the brake lever clamp is attached to the bare handlebars. Then the leather strips and soaked in water to soften the leather, then each is laced onto the handlebars using "linen" thread beginning near the center using two (2) needles, like lacing a shoe. As the leather dries it will shrink to fit." The clean symmetrical lacing and the perfectly matched flush fit seam testify to the patience and skill of the person who applied this. Curiously enough, most of the factory literature and images of used Austro-Daimler and Puch bicycles models manufactured before and after my 1978 Vent Noir II was made show their handlebars being provided with conventional fabric tape covering. I suspect this Almarc covering was a short-lived upgrade product provided with the Vent Noir II models that was discontinued as being too time/labor intensive to install. Yet even after all these years this leather covering still feels great! No matter how much I have considered spending for today's state of the art composite bar and coverings I find nothing that equals the elegance of this set. Since I wanted to buy this bike then but my funds were not equal to the task, Larry Black offered to modify the bike somewhat to suit my budget. We swapped out some Campy gear for Shimano which was probably just as good at half the cost. The final cost of this bike was $750.00 plus the local five percent State Sales Tax amounting to $787.50. At the time I could not have not fully understood how my mindset would change later but truth be told had I ordered it in an "All Euro" arrangement, then better things might not have happened to it later. The Vent Noir II turned out to be a joy to ride, durable and resistant to the elements and shocks of day to day riding on suburban streets and paved paths. At about 22 lbs. this was not a world class ultra lightweight racer but in many ways it was leagues beyond the technology of my first ten speed, a yellow Schwinn Le Tour of 1974. The Schwinn Le Tour bicycle with its kickstand weighs about 31 lbs. This model was made in Japan for Schwinn (hence labeled Schwinn Approved) and sold in the USA for $147.95 in 1974. However, even an economically accessorized Vent Noir II of 1980-81 cost notably more. I found either bike was wholly adequate for day to day fast touring rides for that one with cast iron legs could enjoy, but the Vent Noir II felt so much lighter and responsive that it seemed as though it might just run right out ahead from under me! Accessory Items That Date It:
Right: close up of author's bicycle showing Flickstand brace extended to lock front wheel (77,881 bytes). Of course today there is the Velcro strap spanning the brake and handlebar, or around the front wheel to frame to lock the bike in place but to me either lacks the techno appeal of the Flickstand.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
This D-shaped type of lock, sometimes referred to as a shackle lock, was developed by bicycle mechanic Stanley Kaplan and put into production by 1971. It was marketed under the trade name 'Kryptonite Lock' by KBL Corporation, Mike Zane's company. Their improved range of bike locks (and locks for other markets too) are in production to this day although the company was acquired in 2001 by Ingersoll-Rand.
In 1981 the bicycle lock I selected for my Austro-Daimler was made by The Citadel locks (as are most of this type) are provided with a metal bracket that bolts onto the bike frame and can hold the lock, but this exposes the lock and its circular key cylinder to the elements and grime. The Citadel lock sold in 1980 for about $29.95 and was accompanied by an insurance policy against loss of a protected bicycle. As I recall the policy of 1980 covered up to $350 loss (up from $150 in 1977) - not enough to reimburse the cost of losing my Austro-Daimler however reassuring nonetheless. I do not recall exactly why I selected the Citadel over Kryptonite; it may have been the gold anodizing caught my eye or that might have been the only brand sold at the time when I purchased the bicycle at College Park Bicycles. Reviews I have read since indicate the Citadel remains among the best constructed and more tamper resistant D style bicycle locks. And so as I see how clean my 26 year old Citadel lock remained over the decades, and how it works effortlessly with the two keys, I again appreciate the choice of the Lock Sock.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Another item that dates my Vent-Noir II is the "Lock Sock", a lock holder made of a durable synthetic. The Lock Sock appealed to me as a way of protecting my Citadel lock while also providing a convenient space to store folded documents or other small items. This is attached to the Top Tube by a Velco flap and is suspended just forward of the Seat Post. A smaller flap near the bottom of the Lock Sock is strapped to the Seat Tube to reduce lateral sway of the loaded Lock Sock. This accessory was made to fit the then recently introduced high security "D" shaped metal bicycle frame locks. Being made of fabric and keeping the lock away from the frame the Lock Sock, even with the lock stored within it, ever scarred the frame of my bicycle. I am not sure who made this Lock Sock but around 1980 Sojourn Designs of Boulder, Colorado (marketed as "Velocipac Fox") was among the few companies that made frame bags that fit between the top, seat and downtubes. They may have offered this accessory.
Right: close up of author's bicycle showing Lock Sock strapped onto the frame (70,772 bytes).
In the days before compact CO2 inflators bikes were equipped with an air pump that was usually attached to the frame. In hindsight I realize a mistake was made in choosing a pump that compressed in length to span from the bottom bracket up to a metal slit ring bracket clamped around the Seat Tube. The length of the pump necessitated placing the clip so that it damaged the "TI Reynolds 531" decal. But more about that later. The bike survived the years and environments well because it was stored covered in a garage, and needed only occasionally washed and lubricated. It is free of rust even in the area of the Bottom Bracket. Over time my only concerns have involved wear and tear issues to the bike decals, the minor scuffing of the Avocet seat and of the Almarc handlebar leather coverings. It also remained on my mind that my bike was not "All Euro" but it was instead a mishmash of European and Japanese components dictated by my original budget. Since seeing him in 1981 Larry Black had become quite successful at making many people happy so that he opened a second store Mt. Airy Bikes in Maryland. In April 1997 I purchased a Giant Cadex CF-1 carbon fiber bike, again from Larry Black at Mt. Airy Bikes. This is a very comfortable frame and is outfitted with 'Rock Shock' titanium suspension fork system and other components that are better suited for riding primitive trails. So I retired my Austro-Daimler from day to day use. By 2006 I treated the Cadex to some technology upgrades including top line Shimano Deore XT components. By the Summer and Fall of 2006 I tried to build what I thought would be my dream road bike, this was to have been based on the Colnago C-50 carbon fiber frame also with first rate components, and all weighing in at under 15 lbs. But this effort crashed and burned so badly that I wrote an article about the experience My Colnago Misadventure: A C-50 FLR Bicycle Frame Nightmare; let's call this my attempt at catharsis after that episode. In 2007 a new distributor took over for Colnago in the USA and in April 2007 I again placed an order for the C-50 FLR with a promised delivery in a matter of weeks, but months later with no C-50 FLR in sight I cancelled that order. Making This Vent Noir II My Vent Noir After the Colnago C-50 FLR experience I decided to revisit the Austro-Daimler to see if I could make it more like what I wish it had been when I bought it. The bike company had such a long history, and the Vent Noir II was so distinctive and classy that I decided to have it overhauled and upgraded while attempting to employ the best components that would have been found in the early 1980's. So after something more than 25 years, in October 2006 my Vent Noir II was again in the capable hands of the man who sold it to me. I explained to Larry my primary concerns and hopes for the Vent Noir II:
2. The components would be appropriate to the time this bike was made. 3. Replace the inner tubes and tires. 4. Recondition the Leather Covers on the handlebar. It turned out the Almarc Leather covering on the handlebars were essentially in very good condition with only some mild scuffing of the sides that could be made to disappear with a little leather conditioning creme. Since I could find no other company in the bike world that seemed to make a durable leather wrap with flush seams such as these, I decided to leave this original aspect of the bike as it is and periodically apply Brooks brand Leather Conditioning Cream.
A complete 50th Anniversary Set is accompanied by a card listing the components included in that set. The set consist of: serialized Registration Card and documents, Brake Calipers, Brake Levers with Gum Rubber Hood, Front Derailleur, Rear Derailleur, Shifters, Cables, Seat Post (25, 26.6, 26.8, or 27.2mm diameter), Headset, Front and Rear Wheel Hubs (to fit 36 spokes or to fit 32 spokes), Bottom Bracket (British, French or Italian threading), Crankset (170, 172.5, or 175mm), Front Derailleur Changer (either a braze-on or a clip-on), Crank Arm Dust Cover Pin Tool, Pedals, Pedal Toe Clips (medium or large), hard shell fitted Case with fabric cover. Between the Fall of 2006 into early 2007 I found it was not terribly difficult to find a complete Campagnolo 50th Anniversary set for sale, although now they were selling for several times the original typical $650 price of the early 1980s. These were often unused sets for sale by vintage bicycle specialty shops, and at on line sales sites including eBay. In time I acquired one complete like-new 50th Anniversary cased set that includes the correct Bottom Bracket in British Threading (1.370 in x 24 TPI) for my Austro-Daimler. But I developed some sense of guilt at the thought of buying a like new never used set and then essentially violating it by installing it onto a bike to ride casually. I also wondered why should I pay premium dollars for a set in the custom fitted carrying case, registration card, etc.? So I stored the first set, for what or when I still do not know but cannot bring myself to part with it. Then I rejoined the hunt and soon found another 50th Anniversary Set with 170mm long Crank Arms, and with two 36-spoke hubs being offered for sale; this set was not cased but represented as having come from a display model bicycle. I delivered these components to Larry Black for installation on my bike.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
and the Poster artwork issued by Campagnolo to commemorate the 50th Anniversary event.
The rear Derailleur of this set came equipped with distinctive upgrade ten-tooth pulleys anodized in red. After some research I determined were the 'BULLSEYE' brand sealed bearing guide and tension Pulleys. The Bullseye products were developed by Roger Durham, a motorcycle and bicycle enthusiast who started formed "Durham Bicycles" in Burbank, California. An avid cyclist and bicycle club member, by 1972 Roger introduced the first of his own brand of innovative components for BMX and road bicycles. By 1973 their product line included the Bullseye pulleys, a pair of machined aluminum low friction pulleys. These pulleys were among the first incorporating sealed precision ball bearings, a distinct improvement over those provided then by Campagnolo or Shimano. left: Durham Bicycles advertisement for Bullseye Pulleys (194,945 bytes) After I learned about the origins of the Bullseye pulleys I realized that with these components made in the USA I was wandering from my stated goal of the 'All Euro' bike - but who would know. Since Bullseye pulleys were sold in many anodized colors I considered toning down the appearance while preserving the improvements by switching from red to gold for example, or in time I may simply install period Campagnolo black Pulleys (0013/03).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
In a last minute attempt to upgrade the appearance from the pretty badly worn original Avocet Saddle, I purchased a lightweight Carbon Fiber Saddle. But this carbon saddle appeared inappropriate (and not so comfortable as my original Avocet), and so in short order I replaced that with a like new vintage Cinelli Saddle.
The Brooks pouch attaches onto loops built into most Brooks Saddles, but I simply wrap the provided leather straps around the Saddle Mounting rails. This is not the easiest thing to do, then adjust balance so that the pouch rests horizontal instead of tilted. But it was worth the cost and effort to do this.
And during my scavenging, and just for the fun of it, I also bought a rather good looking Campagnolo 50th Anniversary 39 x 27 inch poster (shown above) just in case I ever own a home with too much open wall space.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
The Internet continues to evolve and bring the world closer than ever, among the benefits are all the resources that helped me to not only find the rare parts to make my Vent Noir II what it is today, but also literature. Here are Austro-Daimler brochures scanned by Manfred Fratzl, and a TI Reynolds booklet scanned by the host of this site:
Postscript Last year (2006) I began my quest to build the state of the art high technology bike. That drove me to consider the most modern and esoteric bike frames and components made and this culminated in the abortive effort to persuade Colnago of Italy to make a C-50 frame that would meet all my expectations. As I conveyed in My Colnago Misadventure: A C-50 FLR Bicycle Frame Nightmare: "one nice aspect of being an amateur pursuing this for my own riding experience and for my interest in the technology is that this would be my "Über Bike" - the state of the art, ultra lightweight demonstration of the best performance technology of 2006 - and all without having to comply with competitive weight minimums." And: "even as I researched the best technology for 2006 it seemed that my "state of the art bicycle" would be obsolete within weeks. I read for example that Campagnolo would soon introduce an improved line of "Record" series components...I read about electronically controlled Derailleurs that were already showing up on the racing scene and nearing the consumer market. And I wondered how long before I would find myself again wanting to upgrade my old "state of the art" mechanical components to keep my bike where I wanted it to be - in the forefront of bike tech." I find it a ironic and somewhat enlightening how over time I came to realize the bike that appealed to my sense of beauty and high tech was sitting in my garage all those years, just awaiting its Renaissance. This Vent Noir II revives my satisfaction and my appreciation of materials and traditions of craftsmanship from days gone by. This effort has been a complete technical success too and the truth is told during the ride: it has shed some weight, the shifting is quicker and more precise, the ride is much quieter, and the Cinelli seat is more comfortable. An elegant machine; this Vent Noir II is compliant, rides smoothly and in near silence, and in all its years it has never let me down. And yes, it was worth the twenty six years wait and effort to get it right! I thank those who have contributed information and images for this article including F. Manfred. Contact the author of this site.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contents © 2007-2011, M. Cohen and respective contributors. All Rights Reserved |